13
School District #23 requires that a CUSTODIAN EVALUATION must be:
1. Completed ten (10) days prior to the end of probation. (Buckley failed to do so)
2. Shown to the employee. (Buckley deceitfully hid them from Fisher)
3. Signed by all parties. (Buckley failed to give Fisher a chance to sign them)
4. Forwarded to the Human Resources Department of School District #23.
Principal Buckley ignored those SD #23 requirements.
She hid the evaluations from Custodian Fisher, who was never shown them for discussion and signing as required by SD #23. Buckley was out to get Fisher fired at all cost, she was not about to allow Fisher the opportunity as SD #23 required. No Buckley was not into fairness. Meanwhile SD #23 turned a blind eye. Buckley operated a double standard, everyone but her had to obey the rules.
Two different custodian evaluations for the same period, each filled in differently and hidden from Fisher by Principal Buckley
THANK YOU....YOUR VISIT IS APPRECIATED
Two different custodian evaluations for the same period, each filled with Buckley trash and hidden from Fisher by Principal Buckley
Buckley was dishonest, unethical & denied Fisher his rights. click on page 11 to read more about Buckley's lack of integrity & incompetence.
Through the British Columbia Freedom Of Information Commissioner, Fisher was able to uncover two evaluations deceitfully hidden from him by Buckley, both for the same time period and each filled in differently.
HIDDEN EVALUATIONS
October 15, 2002 CKOV 630
Kelowna talk show
Ron Rubadeau the Superintendent of School District 23
went on air to claim that allegation made on these web pages
against SD23 had not been sustained.
And this man influences our our children!
Rubadeau is either uninformed, in denial or being dishonest.
Buckley submitted unwarranted and undeserving Custodian Evaluations replete
with error and inconsistency with the sole intention of depriving Fisher of employment.
Rubadeau, Akehurst, Lownsbrough, Buckley & Lalonde conspired to defraud Fisher of
money, regular employee status, employee rights & health benefits.
Rubadeau, Akehurst, Lownsbrough, Buckley & Lalonde's conduct toward Custodian Fisher can be described as harsh, vindictive, malicious & reprehensible and called it a substantial departure from the conduct and practices to be reasonably expected from
School District #23 Administrators.
CLICK to Hear Rubadeau >>>>>>
(Takes a few moments but worth the wait)
For all the Correspondence related to the Wrongful Dismissal of Custodian Fisher click LETTERS
Principal Buckley
Principal Buckley
1. Spreading malicious rumors about the victim in School District #23 documents.
2. Withholding necessary job evaluation information from the victim.
3. Constantly changing expectations applicable to the victim.
4. Blocking the victim's leave for promotion to regular employee status.
5. Assigning unreasonable duties to the victim already working an oversize area.
6. Constantly & persistently criticizing the victim's work.
7. Making false accusations about the victim knowing them to be wrong.
(There was no evidence found, that Buckley had met the requirement to forward the evaluations to the Human Resources Department nor that School District #23 questioned her failure to follow procedure. Under Rubadeau SD #23 lacks the necessary system checks & balances found in a competent administration)
At a time when there is concern about schoolyard bullying, Buckley, Lalonde & Stutter got away with workplace bullying Custodian Fisher
Principal Buckley submitted unwarranted and undeserving
Custodian Evaluations replete with error and inconsistency
with the sole intention of depriving Fisher of employment.
Rubadeau, Akehurst, Lownsbrough, Buckley & Lalonde conspired
to defraud Fisher of money, regular employee status,
employee rights & health benefits.
SD #23 failed to ensure, that the information Buckley supplied & that
it intended to rely on, for the performance evaluation was accurate.
SD #23 also failed to ensure, that Buckley conducted the
evaluation itself as objectively & fairly as possible!
Besides the obvious, the following are also considered workplace bullying:
Click here to read more about workplace bullying
School District #23 did not have the right to add 52 additional days to Fisher's probation nor fire him on Feb 25 / 99 for general unsuitability since Fisher had served the required 65 days of probation & legally earned regular employee status with benefits on July 24, 1998 preventing dismissal on grounds of general unsuitability.
SCHOOL DISTRICT #23 MALFEASANCE
13
Following are examples of what experts refer to as psychological violence in the workplace that takes the form of bullying, intimidation & harassment.
Principal Buckley used distortion to have 52 days added to Fisher's probation period.
Principal Buckley often shortened Custodian Fisher's shift, then assigned extra work.
Vice Principal Lalonde told lies about Fisher to SD #23 administration.
Head Custodian Stutter constantly unjustifiably criticized Fisher.
Head Custodian Stutter constantly threatened Fisher with a bad report.
Head Custodian Stutter told lies about Fisher to Principal Buckley.
Head Custodian Stutter lied about ordering desperately needed supplies & equipment.
#2
Buckley did not give Fisher the chance to see or sign #2 Evaluation as required by SD#23
Buckley did not give Fisher the chance to see or sign #2 Evaluation as required by SD#23
Not signed by administrator
SD 23 was “malicious, high-handed, outrageous, reckless, wanton, entirely without
care, intentional, deliberate, callous, disgraceful, willful, exploitative, and in disregard
of Custodian Fisher's rights and indifferent to the consequences.”
On this Principal Buckley first checked off No then changed it to NI needs improvement. Truth is Ken was better trained than the Head Custodian & Ken's cleaning was superior to the Head Custodian's work. Below are Ken's Duties to Do Lists that he carried & check each item off as it was completed each night.
Principal Buckley checked off NI needs improvement. Truth is Ken had an excellent relationship with the Teachers in the area that he cleaned & with all night use groups..see below a thank you card from a teacher in appreciation for finding her ear ring & for getting her extra rolls of paper towels. Principal Buckley on the other hand never thanked Ken for finding & bringing to her a fake hypodermic needle. She harboured ill feelings towards Ken ever since he suggested that the proper thing for her to do was to go though the Head Custodian rather than go through Ken regarding the custodian room in the portables.
Here are a few examples of Principal Buckley's incompetence & lack of good judgement bordering on distortions & misinformation when evaluating Custodian Fisher. For more examples click link above.
To: Ken..our #1 custodian
...thanks for letting us in
Thanks for always
remembering us on time
Yes
NI
Yes
No
NI
Not signed by administrator
Buckley did not give Fisher the chance to see or sign #1 Evaluation as required by SD#23
#1
Buckley did not give Fisher the chance to see or sign #1 Evaluation as required by SD#23
Principal Buckley checked off NI needs improvement. Truth is Ken had an excellent relationship with the Teachers in the area that he cleaned & with all night use groups..see below a thank you card from a night group in appreciation for always being on time to let them into the school.
Yes
No
No
NI
VP Alan Lalonde
SD #23's claims against Fisher are groundless & fabricated. SD #23 colluded & conspired to discredit Fisher.
J.A. Dixon
SD #23's claims against Fisher are groundless & fabricated.
SD #23 colluded & conspired to discredit Fisher.
J.A. Dixon
SD #23 colluded & conspired
to discredit Fisher.
J.A. Dixon
SD #23 colluded & conspired to discredit Fisher.
J.A. Dixon
SD #23 colluded & conspired
to discredit Fisher.
J.A. Dixon
**********
